Editor Resources
Guidance and tools for editors managing ADHD submissions.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 3066-8042
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.3066-8042
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
ADHD research spanning neuroscience, clinical care, education, and lived experience. We prioritize evidence that improves assessment, treatment, and long term support across the lifespan.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JAC provides tools and guidance to help editors manage ADHD submissions efficiently.
Resources focus on standardized review workflows, ethical compliance, and reporting quality for ADHD research.
Editors can access reference materials that support consistent decision making across clinical, educational, and community studies.
Review Templates
Standardized decision letters and reviewer forms.
Reporting Checklists
CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and CARE guidance.
Ethics Guidance
COPE workflows and participant privacy safeguards.
Data Standards
Expectations for clinical and educational datasets.
- Confirm scope fit for ADHD and care contexts
- Match reviewers to clinical, educational, or intervention expertise
- Verify ethics approvals and consent documentation
- Request clarity on outcomes, measures, and time points
- Monitor review timelines and follow up promptly
The editorial office provides assistance for complex submissions, including guidance on data transparency or conflict resolution. Editors can request additional reviewers for specialized methods or clinical expertise.
Editors receive access to reporting guidance, ethics resources, and ADHD terminology references. These materials help standardize decisions and maintain consistent expectations across submissions.
Resources are refreshed regularly.
Decision templates and reviewer invitation language are available to streamline communication. These tools help editors maintain clarity and consistency across the review process.
Templates can be customized to fit specific ADHD topics.
Workflow tools support consistent documentation of decisions.
Tools reduce administrative burden and support faster decisions.
JAC is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in ADHD research and care. We emphasize reproducible study design, clear reporting of clinical and functional outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in neurodevelopmental science, clinical care, and educational practice.
Need Editorial Support?
Contact the editorial office for resources or workflow guidance.
