Journal of New Developments in Chemistry

Journal of New Developments in Chemistry

Journal of New Developments in Chemistry

Current Issue Volume No: 1 Issue No: 4

Review Article Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation

Literature Review Paper on Mechanical Properties of Types of Carbon Nanotubes

1 Aerospace Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) Level 7, Tower Block, Faculty of Engineering 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

2 Systems Engineering Department, Military Technological College, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Abstract

Among the numerous potential uses of carbon nanotubes (CNT), its utilization to fortify polymers was given careful consideration. This reason can be because of the remarkable firmness, magnificent quality, and the low thickness of CNT. This has given various chances to the innovation of new material frameworks for applications requiring high quality and high modulus. Exact control over preparing factors, including safeguarding flawless CNT structure, uniform scattering of CNT inside the polymer grid, compelling filler– lattice interfacial communications, and arrangement/introduction of polymer chains/CNT, add to the composite strands' unrivalled properties. Consequently, manufacture techniques assume an imperative part in deciding the composite filaments' microstructure and extreme mechanical conduct. The present best in the class of polymer/CNT elite composite filaments, particularly concerning processing– structure– execution, were looked into in this commitment. Future requirements for material by configuration approaches for handling these nano-composite frameworks were likewise examined.

Author Contributions
Received 27 Jun 2018; Accepted 06 Aug 2018; Published 17 Aug 2018;

Academic Editor: Dr. Ashish Kumar, Associate Professor and HOD -Department Of Chemistry, Lovely Professional University Phagwara, India.

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2018 Elias Randjbaran,et al.

License
Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Citation:

Elias Randjbaran, Zahari , Dayang Laila Abang Haji Abdul Majid, Mohamed Thariq Bin Hameed Sultan, Norkhairunnisa Mazlan (2018) Literature Review Paper on Mechanical Properties of Types of Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of New Developments in Chemistry - 1(4):27-43. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2377-2549.jndc-18-2187

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2377-2549.jndc-18-2187

Introduction

The materials are ruled the market as far as their flexibility for item’s applications when the introduction of polymer materials science in the 1930s. These materials had been used as movies, strands, sheets, and coatings. Today, a large portion of the manufactured polymer strands being used traverse applications, for example, garments, rugs, ropes, and support materials. A portion of these filaments incorporate polyamides, for example, nylon, polyesters (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT)), polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE)), vinyl polymers (e.g., poly(vinyl liquor) (PVA) and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)), elastomers (e.g., polyurethane (PU) and spandex), and acrylic strands (e.g., polyacrylonitrile (PAN)) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45. What's more, superior polymer-based strands with high solidness as well as persistence incorporate Dyneema® and Spectra® (i.e., ultra-high sub-atomic weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)- based filaments), Twaron® and Kevlar®, and Zylon® strands (i.e., sweet-smelling based polymers, for example, poly(p-phenyleneterephthalamide) (PPTA) and poly(p-phenylenebenzobisoxazole) (PBO)) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Likewise included was PANNING, which was the overwhelming forerunner fibre for the carbon fibre industry 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41.

General Fabrication Procedures for Polymer/CNT Fibbers

This audit paper centred on the top of the line of polymer/CNT composite materials to investigate their processing-structure-property connections. The four-noteworthy fibre-turning techniques (Figure 1) utilized for polymer/CNT composites from both the arrangement and soften incorporate dry turning 51, 52, wet turning 53, dry fly wet turning (e.g., gel-turning 54), and electro-turning 55, 56. An old strong state turning approach has been utilized for manufacturing 100% CNT strands from the two woods and aerogels 57, 58, 59, 60. Despite the handling system, to grow excellent strands numerous parameters should be all around controlled. As a rule, all turning systems include (I) fibre arrangement; (ii) coagulation/gelation/cementing; and (iii) drawing/arrangement. For these procedures, the even scattering of the CNT inside the polymer arrangement or dissolve was critical. Nevertheless, as far as accomplishing superb hub mechanical properties, arrangement and introduction of the polymer chains and the CNT in the composite was vital. Fibre arrangement was expert in post-preparing, for example, drawing/toughening and was critical to expanding crystallinity, rigidity, and solidness 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79.

Figure 1.Schematics for the different fibre preparing techniques (a) dry-turning; (b) wet-turning; (c) dry-stream wet or gel turning; and (d) post-handling by hot-arrange drawing 10.
 Schematics for the different fibre preparing techniques (a) dry-turning; (b) wet-turning; (c) dry-stream wet or gel turning; and (d) post-handling by hot-arrange drawing 10.

Smaller scale Structural Development in Polymer/CNT Fibres

The general picture of mechanical execution for polymer/CNT filaments delivered at the exploration level demonstrates a wide scope of properties (Figure 2). These strands were delivered utilizing a few manufacture strategies. As said, the revelation of CNT introduced a lot of research endeavours concentrated on using these nano-materials to make polymer composite strands to catch these outstanding properties (i.e., 1 TPa in ductile modulus and 10 to 150 GPa 21, 22, 23, 24 of every rigidity).

Figure 2.Rundown of Young's modulus, elasticity, and strain-to-disappointment properties for different polymer/CNT filaments delivered at the examination scale 353638– 47112– 116 (Note: □/■ images for rigidity/modulus properties for superior strands, and Δ/▲ images for rigidity/modulus properties of material review filaments).
 Rundown of Young's modulus, elasticity, and strain-to-disappointment properties for             different polymer/CNT filaments delivered at the examination scale 353638– 47112– 116 (Note: □/■ images for  rigidity/modulus properties for superior strands, and Δ/▲ images for  rigidity/modulus properties of material review filaments).

The natural properties of CNT accept that the structure was very much protected (i.e., substantial angle proportion and without surrenders). Going further, the initial move toward viable support of polymers utilizing nano-fillers was to accomplish a uniform scattering of the fillers inside the facilitating network, and this was additionally identified with the as-blended nano-carbon structure. Furthermore, successful interfacial communication and stress exchange amongst CNT and polymer was fundamental for enhanced mechanical properties of the fibre composite. At last, like polymer particles, the great-inborn mechanical properties of CNT can be completely misused just if a perfect uniaxial introduction was accomplished. In this way, amid the manufacture of polymer/CNT filaments, four key territories should be tended to and comprehended with a specific end goal to effectively control the small-scale auxiliary improvement in these composites. These are: (I) CNT perfect structure; (ii) CNT scattering; (iii) polymer-CNT interfacial communication; and (iv) introduction of the filler and grid particles (Figure 3). This survey will feature some key papers that had concentrated on these zones to tailor the composite structure and propel the mechanical execution of the polymer nano-composite 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31.

Figure 3.Four central points, which are influencing the small-scale basic advancement in polymer/CNT composite fibre amid preparing 353638– 47112– 116.
 Four central points, which are influencing the small-scale basic advancement in polymer/CNT composite fibre amid preparing 353638– 47112– 116.

A further examination of the distributed writing additionally demonstrates a fascinating pattern, whereby the percent expansion in mechanical properties for polymer composite filaments was identified with the inalienable polymer structure (Figure 4) 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.

Figure 4.Normal percent expansion correlation between control strands (no fillers) and composite filaments for both the Young's modulus and rigidity properties 353638– 47112– 116.
 Normal percent expansion correlation between control strands (no fillers) and composite filaments for both the Young's modulus and rigidity properties 353638– 47112– 116.

Compound functionalization increments the between tube contacts (i.e., helpful for working up a conductive system) and gives more potential outcomes to bond the nanotubes to a framework because of responsive concoction gatherings. Then again, covalent surface medications can decimate tube structure, bringing about shortening of nanotubes 55, 56, making of deformities in the graphitic structure of CNT dividers 33, 56, 57, and at times, unfastening of the tube structure. Therefore, substance functionalization will diminish the mechanical properties of CNT 58. Non-covalent scattering techniques had additionally been created to peel SWNT groups into singular tubes in various solvents utilizing different anionic, cationic, non-ionic surfactants 34, 59 or polymers 35, 60. The SWNT modulus, quality, and interfacial shear quality were taken to be 1 TPA, 50 GPa, and 100 MPa (i.e., in view of computational forecasts) 20, 64, 65, separately. To exhibit the significance of the length commitment in the composite, which was plotted by utilizing polymer framework modulus esteems running from 1 to 100 GPa, and quality qualities extending from 0.01 to 5 GPa. These qualities compare to the commonplace properties revealed for polymers utilized as a part of CNT composite preparing 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47. The modulus and quality increment as for viewpoint proportion can be seen that both solidness and quality of the filaments scale with viewpoint proportion. A comparable pattern has additionally been accounted for composite movies 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34. Plainly, the scattering of the CNT as far as shedding, circulation, and length safeguarding were exceptionally critical angles influencing the advancement of the composite microstructure. Each factor was subject to the next and finding the correct adjust remains a test. Albeit a few strategies for scattering had been talked about, it was critical to perceive that without great polymer nanotube communication; even very much scattered CNT may not give viable support of the framework. To enhance polymer-CNT collaborations, interfacial advancement was essential. The accompanying Section 3.2 examines a portion of the systems for the improvement of interfacial structures in the polymer composite strands. To do this will require further major comprehension of the nano-composite framework as far as morphology development amid handling. The interfacial connection happens through a few instruments: (I) mechanical coupling, smaller scale mechanical interlocking and polymer chain-CNT ensnarement; (ii) physical collaboration, including van der Waals powers, electrostatic powers, or epitaxial precious stone development; and (iii) substance associations. As said in the past segment, these substance connections incorporate covalent holding and physical holding, for example, surfactant-helped scattering of CNT 33, plasma polymerization 67, and polymer wrapping 68, 69. A few examinations had concentrated on understanding the quality of the interface for polymer/CNT materials. For PVA/CNT composites, it was discovered that the shearing brought about crack of the grid before the breakage of the interphase polymer 70. The shear pressure was resolved to associate with 40 MPa, which was in sensible concurrence with anticipated estimations of ~50 MPa 70. Other computational works had moreover been done to foresee the interfacial shear pressure (IFSS). Polymer frameworks, for example, polystyrene (PS) 71, epoxy 72, poly (m-phenylenevinylene-co-2, 5-dioctyloxy-p-phenylenevinylene) (PmPV), what was more, poly (phenyl acetylene) (PPA) 73 had been figured utilizing atomic progression, where the computed IFSS was subject to both the polymer and CNT. In such cases, the IFSS esteems ran from 18 to 186 MPa. Aside from the figurings and re-enactments, coordinate estimations had likewise been accounted for. The systems and gadgets for these estimations incorporate checking electron microscopy (SEM) 20, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 74, nuclear power microscopy (AFM) 64, 75, and filtering test microscopy (SPM) 76. These announced qualities extend from 0.02 to 500 MPa 39, 16, 26, 65, 74, 75, 76. The bigger IFSS esteems were reliable with composites where covalent holding was available at the interphase (i.e., functionalized CNT). Estimations of 0.5 GPa assessed by Wagner et al. 74, and 0.35 GPa estimated by Cooper et al. 76 were estimated using the AFM and were ascribed to covalent holding amongst CNT and polymer. To date, the lion's share of interphase estimations and expectations had concentrated on either perfect CNT or functionalized CNT installed in shapeless polymer dissolves. Less was thought about the interfacial mechanical properties of crystalline polymer at the CNT interphase, particularly in situations where the polymer can frame requested stages along the CNT length. A few on-going papers had featured the significance of crystalline interphase arrangement in these composites 39, 42, 43, 77, 78, 79. It has been watched that CNT can nucleate and format the development of requested polymer gems in a few polymer frameworks including PE 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, nylon 6,6 82, PVA 86, PAN 87, poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) 88, 89, 90, isotactic polypropylene (iPP) 91, poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) 91, poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) 92, and polyethylene-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PE-b-PEO) square copolymer 93. One of the overwhelming support components in polymer/CNT composites has been recommended to be the nearness of requested polymer interfacial covering structure close CNT 94. This arranged structure can frame because of the capacity of CNT to communicate particularly with the polymer grid. Requested or crystalline polymer structure in polymer nano-composites was mechanically more grounded than shapeless structure due to the nearness of fewer imperfections or less scattered areas. Along these lines, it was critical to ponder CNT-actuated polymer crystallization to control these systems amid the arrangement of the interphase in the polymer/CNT composites. On an atomic level, a diminished interpenetration/snare of chains close to a strong interface cause chain arrangement, the configuration-change energies, and rehash unit-surface association energies to change 95. Likewise, changes in response energy and interfacial versatility (i.e., due to crosslink thickness) can likewise influence the framework 95. Glass progress, polymer dispersion, nanotube dissemination, crystalline structure, crystallization energy, and properties can likewise be adjusted 95. This marvel was not seen with other usually utilized small-scale fillers 95. Extra work has demonstrated that the interphase polymer morphology was totally unique in relation to the mass polymer in the composite, and this means high modulus and elasticity esteems (i.e., modulus about 5 and 400 GPa and quality >1 GPa). Examination of these interphase areas by microscopy demonstrates that they show crystalline flawlessness 42, 43, 44. As already said, a few works had likewise demonstrated the capacity of the nanotube to nucleate polymer gem development at the interphase 82, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101. In addition, layout gem development and introduction in polymers 42, 43, 77, 78, 81, 85, 97. This templating impact of CNT in polymer composites has been demonstrated to have a successful commitment toward the pressure exchange component of load between the polymer grid and filler 42, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79. In such situations where templated interphase structure was observed to be available at the interphase, the mechanical properties for the composite were essentially expanded. It was additionally intriguing that the general crystallinity esteem for the composite when contrasted with the control strands was generally the same. This suggests while a bit of the grid polymer frames a much-arranged interphase structure the mass framework remains semi-crystalline and moderately disarranged. It was additionally worth specifying that the expansion in mechanical properties does not take after governing of-blend expectations. This was because of the commitment from the interphase polymer, which was regularly unaccounted for. A few late works had endeavoured to incorporate this commitment for better comprehension of the composite small-scale basic commitment to the mass properties 40, 61. It was additionally imperative to take note of that in some CNT-polymer frameworks where CNT templating was discovered, the crystallinity was regularly much higher in the composite versus the control framework. In such cases, the impact of templating alone was hard to evaluate. Here, the attention was on two frameworks, which show comparative crystallinity keeping in mind the end goal to comprehend the part of the format situated polymer interphase commitment. It has likewise been perceived that in situations where the interphase areas were not format or arranged (i.e., demonstrating chain issue), the mechanical upgrade was not that critical 98. Interfacial push exchange was a basic part/parameter controlling the execution of the composite. Finish pressure/stack exchange from the polymer to the nano-filler was achievable if there was solid grip. In view of these high-determination transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) thinks about, better chain pressing was likewise appeared to exist at the interphase 42, 43, 81.

As of late shear crystallization thinks about in half-breed polymer/SWNT scattering as of late shear crystallization considers in cross breed polymer/SWNT scattering were utilized to initiate arranged polymer crystallization within the sight of the SWNT. These investigations were particularly engaged on building up a method for delivering requested interphase structure on the CNT. Figure 5, Figure 6 demonstrates a HR-TEM picture for a PAN-SWNT interphase, where the polymer broadened chain morphology has been templated by the nanotube 87. This principal crystallization thinks about give great understanding at the morphological abilities of the polymer affected by this system. As far as handling polymer/CNT composite materials, these crystallization procedures may even be fused into creation methodology 109, 110, 111, 112, 113.

Figure 5.Utilised strategies for SWNT scattering towards creation of polymer/CNT nano-composites 353638– 47112– 116.
 Utilised strategies for SWNT scattering towards creation of polymer/CNT nano-composites 353638– 47112– 116.

Figure 6.(a) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of PAN tubular covering on SWNT. High-determination transmission electron micrograph (HR-TEM) of tubular covered Dish/SWNT tests; (b) at the beginning of electron bar presentation; (c and d1) demonstrate a territory of the PAN/SWNT test where the PAN grid of ~0.52 nm is watched; and (d2) a schematic featuring the PAN grid perceptions in (d1) 87.
  (a) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of PAN tubular covering on SWNT.                         High-determination transmission electron micrograph (HR-TEM) of tubular covered Dish/SWNT tests; (b) at the beginning of electron bar presentation; (c and d1) demonstrate a territory of the PAN/SWNT test where the PAN grid of ~0.52 nm is watched; and (d2) a schematic featuring the PAN grid perceptions in (d1) 87.

These nucleation, crystallization, and introduction impacts were particularly seen in composites with low nano-carbon stacking (<one wt %) and significantly affect the general structure and properties of the composite material 42, 43. Arrangement of CNT or CNT ropes was another critical factor in deciding the mechanical properties of composites containing them. As indicated by the continuum mechanics computations, the moduli of both SWNT filler and polymer chains along the hub course drop suddenly for just slight mis-introduction regarding the fibre hub. For SWNT materials, this impact was less articulated as the SWNT package measurement diminishes 105, 106, 107, 108, 109.

What was instantly clear was that in the polymer/CNT composite fibre, the full arrangement of the polymer chain and the CNT was foremost. This was not a simple undertaking. To date, just a bunch of polymer-based elite filaments exists (i.e., Kevlar®, Spectra®, Zylon®), and this was because of the high chain arrangement in the small-scale structure either managed by the innate polymer conformational structure (i.e., pole like particles—Kevlar® and Zylon®) or uncommon preparing of low focus polymer answers for diminish chain trap (i.e., gel turning of polyethylene—Spectra®). Nevertheless, in later work, the similitudes amongst polymers and CNT, CNT templating impacts, CNT fluid crystalline nature, and the capacity of nano-carbons materials to grease up polymers amid arrangement had been perceived. These components all had huge ramifications toward significantly progressing polymer chain arrangement amid handling of the composite 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 .

By looking at the structure, properties, stage conduct, rheology, preparing, and applications amongst SWNT and unbending bar polymers, SWNT were considered as polymeric materials 109, 110. As said, the likeness between CNT (particularly SWNT) and polymers will permit the polymer chains to communicate with SWNT all the more promptly and nucleate on SWNT surfaces because of epitaxy. For this reason, SWNT were conceivably ready to adjust the chains parallel to the pivot course and layout polymer crystallization with expanded chain compliance. For polymeric materials extensional power (normally directed through shear streams in dissolve or arrangement) was required for actuating the broadened chain crystallization and the ensuing developing of the package like fibrils or shish-kebab structures 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93. This shearing instrument was likewise expected to develop fibrillar (expanded chain) precious stones in polymer/CNT crossover frameworks 42, 43, 78, 81. The handling of expanded chain polymer precious stones in CNT frameworks was troublesome and not as normal as the perception of collapsed chain gem structures in these composites 82, 83, 84, 85.

Notwithstanding, a couple of past works had demonstrated that SWNT can prompt nucleation of expanded chain crystallization and layout the arrangement of polymer chains in PE 81, PBT 14, poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) 77, PAN 43, 44, 45, and PVA 42, 78 frameworks. The nearness of CNT was considered add to the polymer core measure in the cross-breed framework, which stifles the vitality boundary for fibrillar crystallization by giving adequate heterogeneous nucleation destinations due to epitaxial connection 85. Under calm conditions, the last crystalline structure and morphology were controlled by the filler attributes (i.e., fixation, synthesis, filler size, and shape) and by the cooperation between the filler and the polymer network. Within the sight of the shear stream, the affecting impacts reach out to shear rate, shear length, and the cooperation amongst shear and fillers 13. In a polymer/nano-particles half and half framework, the presentation of nano-fillers and polymers into shear stream has been appeared to make a synergistic impact for advancing crystallization, because of the adjustments in the nearby feelings of anxiety and introduction of chains encompassing the nano-particles upon the use of shear 13, 85, 96. Hence, the pole like CNT can enormously incite anisotropic nucleation destinations at the interphase and advance the resulting precious stone development in the stream bearing. Under fitting shear stream at a crystallization temperature, PE and PAN had been appeared to take shape into broadened chain shish straightforwardly on SWNT 81, 87 surface, trailed by nucleation of collapsed chain lamellae. In view of the little point X-beam disseminating (SAXS) investigation for the unadulterated PBT framework and PBT/SWNT composites, it was demonstrated the simple low SWNT stacking (0.2 wt. %) can format the morphology of crystallization amid stream, giving a strategy to get an exceedingly attractive fibre-like morphology 114. Patil et al. include inferred that inside the sheared PE/CNT nano-composite framework, the nearness of CNT essentially advances the polymer chain introduction, the length increment, what's more, the steadiness of the half breed shish-kebab structures, because of CNT templating chain arrangement as contrasted with the sheared unadulterated PE framework 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99. Wide-edge X-beam diffraction (WAXD) thinks about on drawn PET/SWNT composite demonstrated that arranged crystallization of PET was initiated by adjusted SWNT in a randomized PET dissolve 77. This introduction of the PET survived even after re-dissolving 78, 79, 80, 81. No introduction was seen in the re-liquefying process in the flawless PET framework, showing the templating part of SWNT upon shear for polymer crystallization 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85. These examinations exhibit the synergistic impacts of the nearness of SWNT and shear stream on advancing polymer broadened chain crystallization at the interphase in the nano-composites. Notwithstanding templating, the utilization of unbending nano-carbons in polymer lattices may likewise empower expanded polymer chain arrangement amid handling 61. Change in chain arrangement has been detailed where an introduction factor (f) increment from 0.5 to 0.8 was found. This along these lines prompted an intense increment in the mechanical execution of the composite when contrasted with the control fibre. This work exhibits the capacity to utilize one of kind nano-fillers to go about as an ointment amid attracting to encourage polymer chain augmentation and introduction. A few examinations had demonstrated that the polymer chains shape special arrangement within the sight of CNT, and this was not the situation in their nonattendance 61, 77, 78, 81, 94. What was required now was the comprehension of how to exploit such a marvel amid handling of the composite. The extraordinary likenesses between the CNT and polymer 110 may bear the cost of chances to grow new extraordinary handling systems that can exploit such parallels to create superior polymer/CNT filaments with all around controlled miniaturized scale structures 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99.

Without great connection between the segments of the framework, the commitment from each was decreased. To date, the presentation of nano-materials and their utilization in composite frameworks had demonstrated that these filler materials can have colossal effect on the lattice segments even with no advancement. Nevertheless, the larger parts of these changes had so far been incremental. Taking full favourable position of the CNT material requires more outline in accordance with the association between the filler and the network, scattering forms, and arrangement of this half and half framework amid fibre turning. Hence, future-handling methodologies of polymer/CNT materials should consolidate some demonstrating/computational angles to foresee what sort of impacts these parameters may really have on the polymer and Nano-filler 120, 121, 122, 123.

Conclusions

This audit condenses examines on the different parameters that influence the reinforcing components in polymer/CNT fibre composite frameworks as a component of preparing. CNT containing polymeric filaments had shown enhanced mechanical and physical properties, for example, elasticity, Young's modulus, strain-to-disappointment, strength, and protection from particle changes from both dissolvable and warmth medicines. Trial factors influencing composite handling incorporate CNT structure, scattering, interfacial cooperation, and arrangement/introduction of polymer chains and CNT. The mix of these elements should be very much controlled keeping in mind the end goal to enhance the resultant mechanical properties of the mass composite fibre. A comprehension of these elements was overwhelming and an awesome test in the field of nano-composite preparing. Nevertheless, expanding essential test knowledge combined with computational and "materials by configuration" methodologies will prompt more productive utilization of CNT in composites and better improvement of creation systems.

References

  1. 1.Cha J, Jin S, J H Shim, C S Park, H J Ryu et al. (2016) Functionalization of carbon nanotubes for fabrication of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites. , Materials and Design; 5(95), 1-8.
  1. 2.Ramanathan M, Shanov V. University of PittsburghKumta PN (2015)Carbon Nanotube-Based Impedimetric Biosensors forBoneMarkerDetection,MitaliPatilDepartmentofBioengineering,SwansonSchool of Engineering. Advances in Materials Science for Environmental and Energy Technologies IV: Ceramic Transactions , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA 253-187.
  1. 3.Pradhan S, Pandey P, Mohanty S, S K Nayak. (2016) Insight on the Chemistry of Epoxy and Its Curing for Coating Applications: A Detailed Investigation and Future Perspectives. , Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering 55, 862-77.
  1. 4.H¨unnekens B, Peters F, Avramidis G, Krause A, Militz H et al. (2016) Plasma treatment of wood–polymer composites: A comparison of three different discharge types and their effect on surface properties. , Journal of Applied Polymer Science,133,18
  1. 5.Bonduel D, Kchit N, Claes M. (2016) Use of carbon nanotubes in structural composites, Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU),SpringerInternationalPublishing. 755-762.
  1. 6.Chen Y, H B Zhang, Yang Y, Wang M, Cao A et al. (2016) High-Performance Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube Sponge for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. , Advanced Functional Materials 26, 447-55.
  1. 7.M S Islam, Deng Y, Tong L, S N Faisal, A K Roy et al. (2016) Grafting carbon nanotubes directly onto carbon fibers for superior mechanical stability: Towards next generation aerospace composites and energy storage applications. , Carbon 96, 701-10.
  1. 8.Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M, Viola E. (2016) Effect of agglomeration on the natural frequencies of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced laminated composite doubly-curved shells. , Composites Part B: Engineering 89, 187-218.
  1. 9.G´omez-del R´ıo T, Salazar A, Pearson R A. (2016) Fracture behaviour of epoxy nanocomposites modified with triblock copolymers and carbon nanotubes. , Composites Part B: Engineering 87, 343-9.
  1. 10.Fujigaya T, Saegusa Y, Momota S, Uda N, Nakashima N. (2016) Interfacial engineering of epoxy/carbon nanotubes using reactive glue for effective reinforcement of the composite, Polymer Journal,48(2);183–8.
  1. 11.H W Zhou, Mishnaevsky L, H Y Yi, Y Q Liu, Hu X et al. (2016) Carbon fiber/carbon nanotube reinforced hierarchical composites: Effect of CNT distribution on shearing strength. , Composites Part B: Engineering 88, 201-11.
  1. 12.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, Abdul Jalil NA, D L Majid. (2014) Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with kevlar/carbon/glass woven fabrics for ballistic impact testing, The Scientific World Journal.
  1. 13.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, N A Jalil, Vaghei R et al. (2013) The effects of stacking sequence layers of six layers composite materials in ballistic energy absorption. , International Journal of Material Science Innovations,1(6);293–305
  1. 14.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, N A Jalil, Vaghei R et al. (2013) The effects of stacking sequence layers of hybrid composite materials in energy absorption under the high velocity ballistic impact conditions: an experimental investigation. , Journal of Material Sciences & Engineering
  1. 15.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, N A Jalil, Vaghei R et al. (2013) Effects of Stacking Sequence on Compression Response Testing of Carbon Fibre and Hybrids: Fibrous-Glass/Carbon/Kevlar/Epoxy Composite Plates. , MATRIX Academic International Online Journal of Engineering and Technology 2(1), 13-7.
  1. 16.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, N A Jalil, Vaghei R et al. (2014) Experimental Study of the Influence of Stacking Order of the Fibrous Layers on Laminated Hybrid Composite Plates Subjected to Compression Loading. , Journal of Science and Engineering 4(1), 01-8.
  1. 17.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, Vaghei R, Karamizadeh F. (2015) A Review Paper on Comparison of Numerical Techniques for Finding Approximate Solutions to Boundary Value Problems on Post-Buckling. in Functionally Graded Materials, Trends Journal of Sciences Research,1,1,1–6 .
  1. 18.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, Vaghei R. (2014) Scanning Electron Microscopy Interpretation In Carbon Nanotubes Composite Materials After Postbuckling - Review Paper. MATRIX Academic International Online Journal of Engineering and Technology,2,2,1–6 .
  1. 19.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, Vaghei R. (2014) Computing Simulation of Postbuckling in Functionally Graded Materials - A Review. , Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,12,12,8344–8
  1. 20.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, Sultan M T H, Mazlan N. (2015) . Effects of Carbon Nanotube on Mechanical Properties of Composite plates—A Review Paper, MATRIX Academic International Online Journal of Engineering and Technology,3,2,1–8 http://maioj.org/pub.aspx?PaperId=101503 .
  1. 21.P R Reddy, T S Reddy, Srikanth I, Madhu V, A K Gogia et al. (2016) Effect of viscoelastic behaviour of glass laminates on their energy absorption subjected to high velocity impact. , Materials & Design 98, 272-9.
  1. 22.Saba N, M T Paridah, Abdan K, Ibrahim N. (2016) A.: Dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm nano filler/kenaf/epoxy hybrid nanocomposites. , Construction and Building Materials 124, 133-8.
  1. 23.Ostovan F, K A Matori, Toozandehjani M, Oskoueian A, H M Yusoff et al. (2015) Effects of CNTs content and milling time on mechanical behavior of MWCNT-reinforced aluminium nanocomposites. , Materials Chemistry and Physics 166, 160-6.
  1. 24.Shabaneh A, Girei S, Arasu P, Mahdi M, Rashid S et al. (2015) Dynamic response of tapered optical multimode fiber coated with carbon nanotubes for ethanol sensing application. , Sensors 15, 10452-64.
  1. 25.N I Ramli, S A Rashid, Sulaiman Y, Mamat M S, S A Zobir et al. (2016) Physicochemical and electrochemical properties of carbon nanotube/graphite nanofiber hybrid nanocomposites for supercapacitor. , Journal of Power Sources 328, 195-202.
  1. 26.Ghaemi F, Yunus R, M A Salleh, S A Rashid, Ahmadian A et al. (2015) Effects of the surface modification of carbon fiber by growing different types of carbon nanomaterials on the mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene, RSCAdvances,5,36,28822–31.
  1. 27.T R Shojaei, M A Salleh, Sijam K, Rahim R A, Mohsenifar A et al. (2016) Fluorometric immunoassay for detecting the plant virus Citrus tristeza using carbon nanoparticles acting as quenchers and antibodies labeled with CdTe quantum dots. , Microchimica Acta 1-1.
  1. 28.C W Lomicka, J A Thomas, E D LaBarre, Trexler M M, A C Merkle. (2014) Improving ballistic fiber strength: insights from experiment and simulation. , Dynamic Behavior of Materials,SpringerInternationalPublishing 1, 187-193.
  1. 29.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, Sultan M T H, Mazlan N. (2016) Effects of Sloped Armour in Ballistic Impact Resistance - A Review Paper,MATRIX. Academic International Online Journal of Engineering and Technology,4,2,19–26 http://maioj.org/data/documents/oct2016/101603.pdf .
  1. 30.Shang Y, Hua C, Xu W, Hu X, Wang Y et al. (2016) Meter-Long Spiral Carbon Nanotube Fibers Show Ultrauniformity and Flexibility, Nano letters,16,3,1768–75.
  1. 31.Wu X, Morimoto T, Mukai K, Asaka K, Okazaki T. (2016) Relationship between Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Continuous Polymer-Free Carbon Nanotube Fibers by Wet-Spinning Method and Nanotube-Length Estimated by FarInfrared Spectroscopy,J.Phys.Chem.C,120,36,20419–20427.
  1. 32.Liu P, Fan Z, Mikhalchan A, T Q, Jewell D et al. (2016) Continuous Carbon Nanotube-Based Fibers and Films for Applications Requiring Enhanced Heat Dissipation. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces,8,27,17461–71 .
  1. 33.Xu W, Chen Y, Zhan H, J N Wang. (2016) High-Strength Carbon Nanotube Film from Improving Alignment and Densification, Nano letters,16,2,946–52.
  1. 34.Zare M, Rayegan-Shirazi A, Rezaei S, Sadat S A, Baneshi M M. (2016) E.: Effects of Polychlorinated biphenyls compounds on the number of bacteria in the rhizosphere of sorghum and Onobrychis sativa. Advances in Bioresearch,7,3 .
  1. 35.Randjbaran Elias, Zahari Rizal, Dayang L Majid, Sultan Mohamed T H, Mazlan Norkhairunnisa. (2018) . , MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF DISCONNECTED MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES AND CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES - A REVIEW PAPER. International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah 6(6), 212-225.
  1. 36.Davaa E, Safari M, Randjbaran E, Randjbaran S. (2016) The Factors That Influence Customer Satisfaction Level in the Mongolian Banking Industry. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management,1,3 .
  1. 37.O’Connor I, Hayden H, J N Coleman, Gun’ko Y.. K.:(2009) High-Strength, High-Toughness Composite Fibers by Swelling Kevlar in Nanotube Suspensions, Small,5,4,466–9 .
  1. 38.Govarthanam K K, Anand S C, Rajendran. (2016) S.: 7 Technical textiles for knife and slash resistance. Handbook of Technical Textiles: Technical Textile Applications 2, 193.
  1. 39.A K Dwivedi, M W Dalzell, S A Fossey, K A Slusarski, Long L R. (2016) Low velocity ballistic behavior of continuous filament knit aramid. , International Journal of Impact Engineering 96, 23-34.
  1. 40.Yang D, Chen X. (2016) Multi-layer pattern creation for seamless front female body armor panel using angle-interlock woven fabrics. , Textile Research Journal 0040517516631315.
  1. 41.C W Lomicka, J A Thomas, E D LaBarre, Trexler M M, A C Merkle. (2014) Improving ballistic fiber strength: insights from experiment and simulation, Dynamic Behavior of Materials. 1, 187-193.
  1. 42.Sockalingam S, S C Chowdhury, J W Gillespie, Keefe M. (2016) Recent advances in modeling and experiments of Kevlar ballistic fibrils, fibers, yarns and flexible woven textile fabrics–a review. , Textile Research Journal 004051751664603.
  1. 43.O’Connor I, Hayden H, J N Coleman, Gun’ko Y.. K.:(2009) High-Strength, High-Toughness Composite Fibers by Swelling Kevlar in Nanotube Suspensions, Small,5,4,466–9 .
  1. 44.Zheng J, Duan X, Lin H, Gu Z, Fang H et al. (2016) Silver nanoparticles confined in carbon nanotubes: on the understanding of the confinement effect and promotional catalysis for the selective hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate,Nanoscale,8,11,5959–67.
  1. 45.Haft M, Gr¨onke M, Gellesch M, Wurmehl S, B¨uchner B et al. (2016) Tailored nanoparticles and wires of Sn, Ge and Pb inside carbon nanotubes,Carbon,101,352–60.
  1. 46.V M Gun’ko, Do D D. (2001) Characterisation of pore structure of carbon adsorbents using regularisation procedure, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,193,1,71–83.
  1. 47.V M Gun’ko, S V Mikhalovsky. (2004) Evaluation of slitlike porosity of carbon adsorbents,Carbon,42,4,843–9.
  1. 48.L Y Jiang, Huang Y, Jiang H, Ravichandran G, Gao H et al. (2006) A cohesive law for carbon nanotube/polymer interfaces based on the van der Waals force. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,54,11,2436–52 .
  1. 49.Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu X J, Ren Y, Li S et al. (2003) Physical interactions at carbon nanotube-polymer interface,Polymer,44. 25-7757.
  1. 50.Liao K, Li S. (2001) Interfacial characteristics of a carbon nanotube–polystyrene composite system, Applied Physics Letters,79,25,4225–7.
  1. 51.Veedu V P, Cao A, Li X, Ma K, Soldano C et al. (2006) Multifunctional composites using reinforced laminae with carbon-nanotube forests. Nature materials,5,6,457–62 .
  1. 52.Wang Y, Colas G, Filleter T. (2016) Improvements in the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube fibers through graphene oxide interlocking,Carbon,98,291–9.
  1. 53.Koizumi R, Hart A H, Brunetto G, Bhowmick S, P S Owuor et al. (2016) Mechano-chemical stabilization of three-dimensional carbon nanotube aggregates,Carbon,110,27–33.
  1. 54.S C Chowdhury, Okabe T. (2007) Computer simulation of carbon nanotube pullout from polymer by the molecular dynamics method, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing,38,3,747–54.
  1. 55.Li Y, Liu Y, Peng X, Yan C, Liu S et al. (2011) Pull-out simulations on interfacial properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science,50,6,1854–60 .
  1. 56.H D Wagner, R A Vaia. (2004) Nanocomposites: issues at the interface, Materials Today,7,11,38–42.
  1. 57.H D Wagner, P M Ajayan, Schulte K. (2013) Nanocomposite toughness from a pull-out mechanism. Composites Science and Technology,83,27–31 .
  1. 58.A M Esawi, Morsi K, Sayed A, Taher M, Lanka S. (2010) Effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) content on the mechanical properties of CNT-reinforced aluminium composites. Composites Science and Technology,70,16,2237–41 .
  1. 59.X Q He, Kitipornchai S, K M Liew. (2005) Buckling analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes: a continuum model accounting for van der Waals interaction. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,53,2,303–26 .
  1. 60.L Y Jiang, Huang Y, Jiang H, Ravichandran G, Gao H et al. (2006) A cohesive law for carbon nanotube/polymer interfaces based on the van der Waals force. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,54,11,2436–52 .
  1. 61.Tan H, L Y Jiang, Huang Y, Liu B, K C Hwang. (2007) The effect of van der Waals-based interface cohesive law on carbon nanotube-reinforced composite materials. Composites Science and Technology,67,14,2941–6 .
  1. 62.Liu X, Q S Yang, X Q He, K M Liew. (2016) Cohesive laws for van der Waals interactions of super carbon nanotube/polymer composites. , Mechanics Research Communications 72, 33-40.
  1. 63.Nagataki A, Takei K, Arie T, Akita S. (2015) Carbon nanotube mechanical resonator in potential well induced by van der Waals interaction with graphene, Applied Physics Express,8,8,085101.
  1. 64.Zhang X, W X Zhou, X K Chen, Liu Y Y, K Q Chen. (2016) Significant decrease in thermal conductivity of multi-walled carbon nanotube induced by interwall van der Waals interactions, Physics Letters A,380,21,1861–4.
  1. 65.L A Chernozatonskii, Artyukh A A, V A Demin, E A Katz. (2016) Bucky-corn: van der Waals composite of carbon nanotube coated by fullerenes, Molecular Physics,114,9,92–101.
  1. 66.Perebeinos V, Tersoff J. (2015) Wetting transition for carbon nanotube arrays under metal contacts, Physical review letters,114,8,085501.
  1. 67.Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M, Viola E. (2016) Effect of agglomeration on the natural frequencies of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced laminated composite doubly-curved shells. , Composites Part B: Engineering 89, 187-218.
  1. 68.Kumar A A, Sundaram R. (2016) Cure cycle optimization for the resin infusion technique using carbon nanotube additives,Carbon,96,1043–52.
  1. 69.Kamarian S, Salim M, Dimitri R, Tornabene F. (2016) Free vibration analysis of conical shells reinforced with agglomerated Carbon Nanotubes. , International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 108, 157-65.
  1. 70.D K Rathore, B P Singh, S C Mohanty, R K Prusty, B C Ray. (2016) Temperature dependent reinforcement efficiency of carbon nanotube in polymer composite. Composites Communications,1,29–32 .
  1. 71.J R Bautista-Quijano, P¨otschke P, Br¨unig H, Heinrich G. (2016) Strain sensing, electrical and mechanical properties of polycarbonate/multiwall carbon nanotube monofilament fibers fabricated by melt spinning. , Polymer 82, 181-9.
  1. 72.T M Herceg, M S Abidin, E S Greenhalgh, M S Shaffer, Bismarck A. (2016) Thermosetting hierarchical composites with high carbon nanotube loadings: En route to high performance. , Composites Science and Technology 127, 134-41.
  1. 73.Wang J, Y K Bahk, S C Chen, D Y Pui. (2015) Characteristics of airborne fractal-like agglomerates of carbon nanotubes. , Carbon 93, 441-50.
  1. 74.A D Moghadam, Omrani E, P L Menezes, P K Rohatgi. (2015) Mechanical and tribological properties of self-lubricating metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene–a review. , Composites Part B: Engineering 77, 402-20.
  1. 75.S J Chen, C Y Qiu, A H Korayem, Barati M R and Duan, H W. (2016) Agglomeration process of surfactant-dispersed carbon nanotubes in unstable dispersion: A two-stage agglomeration model and experimental evidence. , Powder Technology 301, 412-20.
  1. 76.V S Romanov, S V Lomov, Verpoest I, Gorbatikh L. (2015) Stress magnification due to carbon nanotube agglomeration in composites. , Composite Structures 133, 246-56.
  1. 77.Balasubramanian K, Burghard M. (2005) Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes,Small,1,2,180–92.
  1. 78.Wong S S, Joselevich E, A T Woolley, Cheung C L, Lieber C M. (1998) Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre-sized probes in chemistry and biology,Nature,394,6688,52–5. ..
  1. 79.Banerjee S, Hemraj-Benny T, Wong S S. (2005) Covalent surface chemistry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Advanced Materials,17,1,17–29 .
  1. 80.Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M. (2005) Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery, Current opinion in chemical biology,9,6,674–9.
  1. 81.Spitalsky Z, Tasis D, Papagelis K, Galiotis C. (2010) Carbon nanotube– polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties, Progress in polymer science,35,3,357–401.
  1. 82.J P Salvetat, J M Bonard, N H Thomson, A J Kulik, Forro L et al. (1999) Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes, Applied Physics A,69,3,255–60.
  1. 83.B Q Wei, Vajtai R, P M Ajayan. (2001) Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters,79,8,1172 .
  1. 84.Q W Li, Li Y, X F Zhang, S B Chikkannanavar, Y H Zhao et al. (2007) Structure-dependent electrical properties of carbon nanotube fibers. Advanced Materials,19,20,3358–63 .
  1. 85.Dumitrica T, C M Landis, B I Yakobson. (2002) Curvature-induced polarization in carbon nanoshells. Chemical physics letters,360,1,182–8 .
  1. 86.H W Zhang, J B Wang, Guo X. (2005) Predicting the elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,53,9,1929–50 .
  1. 87.Banhart F. (2009) Interactions between metals and carbon nanotubes: at the interface between old and new materials. , Nanoscale,1,2,201–13
  1. 88.M B Jakubinek, Ashrafi B, Zhang Y, Martinez-Rubi Y, C T Kingston et al. (2015) Single-walled carbon nanotube–epoxy composites for structural and conductive aerospace adhesives. , Composites Part B: Engineering 69, 87-93.
  1. 89.Papadopoulos A, Gkikas G, A S Paipetis, N M Barkoula. (2016) Effect of CNTs addition on the erosive wear response of epoxy resin and carbon fibre composites. , Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 84, 299-307.
  1. 90.Fujigaya T, Saegusa Y, Momota S, Uda N, Nakashima N. (2016) Interfacial engineering of epoxy/carbon nanotubes using reactive glue for effective reinforcement of the composite, Polymer Journal,48,2,183–8.
  1. 91.Sun Y, Lu J, Ai C, Wen D, Bai X. (2016) Multilevel resistive switching and nonvolatile memory effects in epoxy methacrylate resin and carbon nanotube composite films. , Organic Electronics 32, 7-14.
  1. 92.Ling Y, Li W, Wang B, Gan W, Zhu C et al. (2016) Epoxy resin reinforced with nanothin polydopamine-coated carbon nanotubes: a study of the interfacial polymer layer thickness,RSCAdvances,6,37,31037–45.
  1. 93.Mei H, Zhang S, Chen H, Zhou H, Zhai X et al. (2016) Interfacial modification and enhancement of toughening mechanisms in epoxy composites with CNTs grafted on carbon fibers. , Composites Science and Technology 134, 89-95.
  1. 94.Wu J, Chen J, Zhao Y, Liu W, Zhang W. (2016) Effect of electrophoretic condition on the electromagnetic interference shielding performance of reduced graphene oxide-carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites. , Composites Part B: Engineering 105, 167-75.
  1. 95.Randjbaran1 Elias. (2018) Literature Review of Investigating Mechanical Properties of Disconnected Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes into Composite. , SF J Material Res Let2: 2.
  1. 96.Schlagenhauf L, Buerki-Thurnherr T, Kuo Y Y, Wichser A, Nuesch F et al. (2015) Carbon Nanotubes Released from an Epoxy-Based Nanocomposite: Quantification and Particle Toxicity. Environmental Science & Technology,49,17,10616–23 .
  1. 97.Rafique I, Kausar A, Anwar Z, Muhammad B. (2016) Exploration of Epoxy Resins, Hardening Systems, and Epoxy/Carbon Nanotube Composite Designed for High Performance Materials: A Review, Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering,55,3,312–33.
  1. 98.Schlagenhauf L, Kuo Y Y, Y K Bahk, N¨uesch F, Wang J. (2015) Decomposition and particle release of a carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposite at elevated temperatures. , Journal of Nanoparticle Research,17,11,1–11
  1. 99.L X Gong, Zhao L, L C Tang, H Y Liu, Y W Mai. (2015) Balanced electrical, thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy composites filled with chemically reduced graphene oxide and rubber nanoparticles. , Composites Science and Technology 121, 104-14.
  1. 100.A K Pathak, Borah M, Gupta A, Yokozeki T, S R Dhakate. (2016) Improved mechanical properties of carbon fiber/graphene oxide-epoxy hybrid composites. , Composites Science and Technology 135, 28-38.
  1. 101.Wang J, Zhao Y, F X Ma, Wang K, F B Wang et al. (2013) Synthesis of a hydrophilic poly-L-lysine/graphene hybrid through multiple noncovalent interactions for biosensors. , Journal of Materials ChemistryB,1,10,1406–13
  1. 102.Tallury S S, M A Pasquinelli. (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of polymers with stiff backbones interacting with single-walled carbon nanotubes. , The Journal of Physical ChemistryB,114,2,9349–55
  1. 103.Pan B, Xing B. (2008) Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environmental Science & Technology,42,24,9005–13 .
  1. 104.Xu Z, Wei C, Gong Y, Chen Z, Yang D et al. (2016) Efficient dispersion of carbon nanotube by synergistic effects of sisal cellulose nano-fiber and graphene oxide, Composite Interfaces,1–5.
  1. 105.Wang Y, Xu Z. (2016) Interaction mechanism of doxorubicin and SWCNT: protonation and diameter effects on drug loading and releasing, RSC advances,6,6,314–22.
  1. 106.Hua Z, Qin Q, Bai X, Huang X, Zhang Q. (2016) An electrochemical biosensing platform based on 1-formylpyrene functionalized reduced graphene oxide for sensitive determination of phenol,RSCAdvances,6,30,25427–34.
  1. 107.Wang Y, Ren P, Gu X, Wen X, Wang Y et al. (2016) Probing the mechanism of benzaldehyde reduction to chiral hydrobenzoin on the CNT surface under near-UV light irradiation. , Green Chemistry,18,6,1482–7
  1. 108.A I L´opez-Lorente, Valc´arcel M. (2016) The third way in analytical nanoscience and nanotechnology: Involvement of nanotools and nanoanalytes in the same analytical process, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry,75,1–9.
  1. 109.Kazemi-Beydokhti A, S Z Heris, M R Jaafari. (2016) Investigation of different methods for cisplatin loading using single-walled carbon nanotube. , Chemical Engineering Research and Design 112, 56-63.
  1. 110.Hajibadi H.Nowroozi A (2016): Study on the interaction of metallocene catalysts with the surface of carbon nanotubes and its influence on the catalytic properties. Investigation of possible complex structures and the influence on structural and electronic properties. , Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
  1. 111.Li J, E C Lee. (2017) Functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes as an efficient additive for electrochemical DNA sensor. , Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 239, 652-9.
  1. 112.Bal S, Samal S S. (2007) Carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites – a state of the art. , Bulletin of Materials Science,30,4,379–86
  1. 113.Chen Y, H B Zhang, Yang Y, Wang M, Cao A et al. (2016) High-Performance Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube Sponge for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding, Advanced Functional Materials,26,3,447–55.
  1. 114.Fujigaya T, Saegusa Y, Momota S, Uda N, Nakashima N. (2016) Interfacial engineering of epoxy/carbon nanotubes using reactive glue for effective reinforcement of the composite, Polymer Journal,48,2,183–8.
  1. 115.N S Bakhtiar, H M Akil, M R Zakaria, M H Kudus, Othman M. (2016) B.: New generation of hybrid filler for producing epoxy nanocomposites with improved mechanical properties. , Materials & Design 91, 46-52.
  1. 116.Ust¨un T, Eskizeybek V, Avci A. (2016) Enhanced fatigue performances of hybrid nanoreinforced filament wound carbon/epoxy composite pipes. , Composite Structures 150, 124-31.
  1. 117.A C Kleinschmidt, J H Almeida, R K Donato, H S Schrekker, V C Marques et al. (2016) Functionalized-Carbon Nanotubes with Physisorbed Ionic Liquid as Filler for Epoxy Nanocomposites. , Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,16,9,9132–40
  1. 118.Randjbaran E, Zahari R, D L Majid, M T Sultan, Mazlan N. (2017) . Reasons of Adding Carbon Nanotubes into Composite Systems–Review Paper. “Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering” 21(3), 549-568.
  1. 119.Akhilesh M, Santarao K, Babu M V S. (2018) Thermal Conductivity of CNT-Wated Nanofluids:. , a Review.” Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering 22, 207-220.
  1. 120.Barkhade T. (2018) . DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1164148 , EXTRACELLULAR BIOSYNTHESIS OF SILVER NANOPARTICLES USING FUNGUS PENICILLIUM SPECIES.”International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH ” 6(1), 277-283.
  1. 121.Mohammad S, Al-Ajely Kareema M, Ziadan Rafed M, Al-Bader. (2018) . DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1167559 , PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CALCIUM FLUORIDE NANO PARTICLES FOR DENTAL APPLICATIONS. ”International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH ” 6(1), 338-346.
  1. 122.Rizzello Loris. (2018) Nanotechnology Meets Immunotherapy: CAR-T Cells Technology and Beyond. https://openaccesspub.org/jbi/article/713 , Journal of Biomaterials - 1(1), 1-6.
  1. 123.Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb.Cristiane Savaris, Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti, Fabrício Augusto de Lima, Luciano Bachmann et al.(2016) Composite Photopolymerization: Temperature Increase According to Light Source and Dentin Thickness. , Journal of Dentistry And Oral 1(2), 11-19.