Editors receive formal recognition, priority access to resources, and opportunities to lead special issues. Benefits acknowledge editorial contributions and support professional advancement.

Editors receive formal recognition and may be invited to lead special issues or contribute editorials.

Clear decision letters and timely reviewer coordination maintain consistency and trust.

The editorial office provides guidance on conflicts, ethics questions, and workflow issues.

Editors commit to fair, timely decisions and uphold confidentiality.

Editors should document key decision rationale and align recommendations with reviewer reports and journal standards.

Accept assignments that match expertise and availability. Communicate early if workload changes to keep review timelines stable.

Editors should communicate decisions respectfully and clearly, outlining key reasons and next steps.

Disclose conflicts of interest and recuse when needed to protect fairness and trust in the review process.

Editors should provide concise decision rationales that reference reviewer feedback and journal standards. Clear explanations help authors respond effectively and improve the revision process.

Suggest qualified reviewers and mentor early career experts to strengthen the reviewer network.

Service letters and certificates are available for institutional reporting and promotion dossiers.

Maintain consistent decision criteria across submissions to support fairness and author trust.

Provide concise decision letters that explain key reasons and next steps. Clear communication improves author response quality.

Editors provide leadership by upholding standards, mentoring reviewers, and promoting fair decision making. Consistent leadership strengthens the journal community and supports author trust in the review process.

Consistent service supports author confidence and journal reputation.

Support reviewers with clear timelines and respond to questions promptly.

Editorial service is recognized in annual journal reporting.