Journal Metrics

Consistent, transparent publishing metrics help authors plan submissions and track impact. The following benchmarks are applied across the International Journal of Nutrition.

Journal At a Glance

International Journal of Nutrition is a peer reviewed, open access journal focused on clinical nutrition, public health nutrition, dietary assessment, and food science. The journal emphasizes transparent methods, data availability, and rapid dissemination for real world impact.

• ISSN: 2379-7835
• Open access publishing model
• DOI assigned to every article
• Global readership and indexing distribution

Editorial Independence

IJN decisions are based on scientific quality, relevance, and methodological rigor. Editorial independence ensures that commercial interests do not influence acceptance, rejection, or editorial commentary.

Editors follow documented criteria for scope, ethics, and reporting quality. The journal maintains consistent standards across all submissions.

This safeguards author trust and long term journal credibility.

Peer Review Model

IJN uses a structured peer review process to evaluate originality, validity, and significance. Reviewers are selected for subject matter expertise and declared conflicts are managed before review begins.

• Initial editorial screening for scope and quality
• Single blind peer review with at least two reviewers
• Decision based on reviewer reports and editorial assessment
• Revisions evaluated against clear response requirements

Review Timelines and Transparency

IJN maintains transparent timelines so authors can plan around funding cycles and professional deadlines. Editors and reviewers are asked to adhere to benchmark timelines, and delays are communicated promptly.

• Clear targets for first decision and revision cycles
• Status updates provided during review stages
• Editorial notes summarize key reasons for decisions

Research Ethics and Integrity

All submissions must follow ethical research standards, including human subject protections and animal welfare requirements. IJN expects authors to provide ethical approval details and informed consent statements when required.

Ethics documentation should be consistent across all revisions and supplemental files.

• Plagiarism screening for all submissions
• Image integrity checks for figures and graphics
• Authorship confirmation and contribution clarity
• Conflict of interest disclosures

Authorship and Contributor Roles

IJN follows clear authorship criteria to ensure accountability and transparency. All listed authors must approve the final manuscript and agree to the submission.

• Describe each author contribution clearly
• Acknowledge funding and institutional support
• Disclose medical writing or editorial assistance
• Address contributor roles for data analysis and study design

Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern

IJN follows established publication ethics guidance for corrections and retractions. If errors are identified after publication, the journal publishes transparent notices that protect the integrity of the research record.

Authors are expected to cooperate with investigations and supply underlying data when requested.

Post Publication Discussion

Scholarly discussion after publication is encouraged when it is evidence based and constructive. Readers may submit comments or clarifications, and authors are invited to respond when appropriate.

If substantial issues are identified, IJN will evaluate the concern and take the appropriate editorial action.

This process supports transparency while protecting the integrity of the published record.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing a clear, evidence based rationale. Appeals are evaluated by a senior editor not involved in the original decision.

Complaints related to ethics, reviewer conduct, or editorial process are handled confidentially and resolved with documented outcomes.

Appeals should be submitted promptly with specific responses to reviewer concerns so the editorial team can assess the request efficiently.

Data, Reporting, and Transparency

IJN promotes complete reporting for nutrition research, including study design, participant flow, and statistical analysis. Data availability statements, funding disclosures, and limitations should be clearly described.

• Clinical trials should provide registration details
• Systematic reviews should include search strategy summaries
• Observational studies should address bias and confounding
• Nutrition intervention studies should report adherence

Authors should state protocol deviations and explain how they affect interpretation.

Frequently Asked Questions