Abstract
Malaria in pregnancy is a serious public health concern that could result in detrimental health outcomes for pregnant women and their foetuses. In Nigeria, there is still a significant risk of the disease epidemic and adverse effects especially in pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the socio-demographic factors associated with Intermittent Preventive Treatment and health seeking behaviours for malaria in pregnancy among women of reproductive ages in Nigeria
Using the National Demographic Survey (NDHS) 2018 data, a cross sectional study was conducted to assess socio-demographic factors associated with Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) for Malaria among Nigerian women of reproductive ages.
Majority were between ages 30-39 years (39.5%), married/cohabiting (91.8%), Muslims (59.5%), from the north (68.9%), uneducated ( 49.9%), poor (47.5%), and grand parous (65.7%). 63.4% of the women had taken fansidar for malaria in pregnancy while only 6.1% had received healthcare for malaria from informal sources. Except for marital status, all socio-demographic variables (regions, highest educational level, wealth index, age group, religion and parity) were significantly associated with intake of IPT. Additionally, region, education, wealth index, age group, marital status and religion were associated with health seeking behaviour for malaria in pregnancy (
After control for other variables, wealth index, highest educational level, married/cohabiting marital status and religion was significantly associated with intake of IPT while region, primary and secondary education, poorer and richest wealth index, widowed/separation influenced health seeking for malaria in pregnancy (P<.05).
The National Malaria Elimination programme should evaluate existing policies that develop interventions that are centred on high risk population in order to prevent malaria in pregnancy while improving health seeking behaviours of women of reproductive ages.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2022
Adejoh Attah Timothy, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Malaria has been identified as one of the most severe public health problems globally This disease remains one of the main causes of mortality and morbidity especially in Sub –Saharan Africa. Africa accounts for the highest burden of malaria with 95% of all cases and 96% of the deaths occurring globally Although malaria affects all Nigerians, children and pregnant women have been found to be at higher risk of severe malaria infection and mortalities. In 2018, about 39% of the 11 million malaria cases among pregnant women occurred in Nigeria In Nigeria, malaria accounts for 60 % of
all Out-patient visits to hospitals, 11 % maternal mortality and 30 % child mortality Despite the numerous programmes that have been implemented to mitigate the risk of malaria in Nigeria, there is still a significant risk of the disease epidemic and adverse effects especially in pregnancy. Considering that the malaria is epidemic and occurs throughout the year, there are limited population based studies assessing certain socio-demographic factors that influences individual as well as community risks for the disease. With pregnant women being at risk of malaria during pregnancy and poor health outcomes, it is important that studies are conducted to assess these risks and improve access to preventive care for this high risk population. The aim of this study is to assess the socio-demographic factors associated with uptake of IPT among pregnant women in Nigeria. This will be achieved through the following objectives; To assess the uptake of IPT among pregnant women in Nigeria To determine socio-demographic factors associated with uptake of IPT for prevention of malaria in pregnancy To determine socio-demographic factors associated with health seeking behaviours for malaria in pregnancy
Results
In this population, 63.4% of the women of reproductive ages had taken fansidar for malaria in pregnancy while only 6.1% had received healthcare for malaria from informal sources. As represented in ( All wealth index categories were significant associated with increased likelihood of taking IPT for malaria in pregnancy including poorer [AOR = 2.72 (CI: 2.38-3.11), ( Women categorized into the poorer wealth index were 2.22 times more likely than the poorest women to seek formal healthcare for malaria in pregnancy [AOR = 2.22(1.59-3.09), Note: Note: Note: OR: Odds ratio, AOR: Adjusted odds ratio, Note: OR: Odds ratio, AOR: Adjusted odds ratio,
S/No
Variables
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
1.
Age Group
<18 years
889
0.7
0.7
19-29 years
28115
22.0
22.0
30-39 years
50358
39.5
39.5
40-49 years
3300
37.8
37.8
2.
Marital Status
Never in union
1581
1.2
1.2
Married/Cohabiting
117150
91.8
91.8
Widowed
5569
4.4
4.4
Divorced/Separated
3245
2.5
2.5
3.
Religion
Christianity
50451
39.6
39.6
Islam
75942
59.5
59.5
Traditional
677
0.5
0.5
Others
475
0.4
0.4
4.
Geo-Political Zone
North Central
21656
17.0
17.0
North East
26293
20.6
20.6
North West
39928
31.3
31.3
South East
14072
11.0
11.0
South South
12436
9.8
9.8
South West
13169
10.3
10.3
5.
Highest Educational Level
None
63699
49.9
49.9
Primary
25311
19.8
19.8
Secondary
30756
24.1
24.1
Higher
7779
6.1
6.1
6.
Wealth Index
Poorest
31148
24.4
24.4
Poorer
29448
23.1
23.1
Middle
27120
21.3
21.3
Richer
23210
18.2
18.2
Richest
16619
13.0
13.0
7.
Parity
Low
14167
11.1
11.1
Multi
29545
23.2
23.2
Grand
83833
65.7
65.7
8.
Presentation of self-reported symptoms of febrile illness
No
13705
10.7
63.4
Yes
7916
6.2
36.6
Missing
105924
83.0
9.
Health Seeking Behaviour for self-reported symptoms of febrile illness
Formal
12,874
10.1
93.9
Informal
831
0.7
6.1
Missing
113840
89.3
S/No
Variable
Took Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria During Pregnancy
No
Yes
Total
1.
Region of Residence
452.31(1)
.000
Urban
2075(27.2)
5559(72.8)
7634(35.3)
Rural
5841(41.8)
8146(58.2)
13987(64.7)
2.
Highest Educational Level
1212.76(3)
.000
None
4636(48.8)
4862(51.2)
9498(43.9)
Primary
1141(33.8)
2232(66.2)
3373(15.6)
Secondary
1811(26.0)
5162(74.0)
6973(32.3)
Higher
328(18.5)
1449(81.5)
1777(8.2)
3.
Wealth Index
1372.83(4)
.000
Poorest
2639(52.7)
2368(47.3)
5007(23.2)
Poorer
2179(44.8)
2686(55.2)
4865(22.5)
Middle
1477(32.5)
3072(67,5)
4549(21.0)
Richer
996(25.0)
2990(75.0)
3986(18.4)
Richest
625(19.4)
2589(80.6)
3214(14.9)
4.
Age Group
43.56(3)
.000
<18 years
364(46.7)
415(53.3)
779(3.6)
19-29 years
3723(36.7)
6431(63.3)
10154(47.0)
30-39 years
2893(35.2)
5330(64.8)
8223(38.0)
40-49 years
936(38.0)
1529(62.0)
2465(11.4)
5.
Marital Status
5.72(3)
.126
Never in union
222(37.0)
378(63.0)
600(2.8)
Married/cohabiting
7438(36.7)
12821(63.3)
20259(93.7)
Widowed
102(37.4)
171(62.6)
273(1.3)
Divorced/Separated
154(31.5)
335(68.5)
489(2.3)
6.
Religion
269.76(3)
.000
Christianity
2653(30.1)
6148(69.9)
8801(40.7)
Islam
5191(41.1)
7454(58.9)
12645(58.5)
Traditional
25(34.7)
47(65.3)
72(0.3)
Others
47(45.6)
56(54.4)
103(0.5)
7.
Parity
84.20(2)
.000
Low
2588(34.8)
4840(65.2)
7428(34.4)
Multi
2083(33.7)
4095(66.3)
6178(28.6)
Grand
3245(40.5)
4770(59.5)
8015(37.1)
S/No
Variable
Health Seeking Behaviour of Women of Reproductive Ages Diagnosed with Malaria in Pregnancy
Formal
Informal
Total
1.
Region of Residence
63.21(1)
.000
Urban
5331(95.9)
228(4.1)
5559(40.6)
Rural
7543(92.6)
603(7.4)
8146(59.4)
2.
Highest Educational Level
144.42(3)
.000
None
4414(90.8)
448(9.2)
4862(35.5)
Primary
2110(94.5)
122(5.5)
2232(16.3)
Secondary
4938(95.7)
224(4.3)
5162(37.7)
Higher
1412(97.4)
37(2.6)
1449(10.6)
3.
Wealth Index
188.28(4)
.000
Poorest
2092(88.3)
276(11.7)
2368(17.3)
Poorer
2509(93.4)
177(6.6)
2686(19.6)
Middle
2917(95.0)
155(5.0)
3072(22.4)
Richer
2843(95.1)
147(4.9)
2990(21.8)
Richest
2513(97.1)
76(2.9)
2589(18.9)
4.
Age Group
17.61(3)
.001
<18 years
380(91.6)
35(8.4)
415(3.0)
19-29 years
6008(93.4)
423(6.6)
6432(46.9)
30-39 years
5060(94.9)
270(5.1)
5330(38.9)
40-49 years
1426(93.3)
103(6.7)
1529(11.2)
5.
Marital Status
14.01(3)
.003
Never in union
342(90.5)
36(9.5)
378(2.8)
Married/cohabiting
12064(94.1)
757(5.9)
12821(93.5)
Widowed
163(95.3)
8(4.7)
171(1.2)
Divorced/Separated
305(91.0)
30(9.0)
335(2.4)
6.
Religion
50l.04(3)
.000
Christianity
5868(95.4)
280(4.6)
6148(44.9)
Islam
6910(92.7)
544(7.3)
7454(54.4)
Traditional
41(87.2)
6912.8)
47(0.3)
Others
55(98.2)
1(1.8)
56(0.4)
7.
Parity
3.85(2)
.146
Low
4564(94.3)
276(5.7)
4840(35.3)
Multi
3855(94.1)
240(5.9)
4095(29.9)
Grand
4455(93.4)
315(6.6)
4770(34.8)
Variable
Took Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria During Pregnancy
Socio-demography
OR (95% CI)
AOR (95% CI)
Region of Residence
Urban
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Rural
0.52(0.49-0.55)
.000
0.97(0.91-1.05)
.487
Highest Educational Level
None
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Primary
4.21(3.71-4.78)
.000
2.43(2.07-2.84)
.000
Secondary
2.26(1.96-2.60)
.000
1.52(1.30-1.7)
.000
Higher
1.55(1.40-1.77)
.000
1.22(1.06-1.41)
.005
Wealth Index
Poorest
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Poorer
4.62(4.16-5.12)
.000
2.72(2.38-3.11)
.000
Middle
3.36(3.03-3.73)
.000
2.18 (1.92-2.49)
.000
Richer
1.99(1.79-2.22)
.000
1.50(1.33-1.69)
.000
Richest
1.38(1.23-1.55)
.000
1.19(1.06-1.35)
.004
Age Group
<18 years
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
19-29 years
1.43(1.22-1.69)
.000
1.12(0.93-1.36)
.232
30-39 years
0.95(0.86-1.04)
.228
1.01(0.90-1.13)
.836
40-49 years
0.89(0.81-0.97)
.011
1.04(0.94-1.15)
.459
Marital Status
Never in union
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Married/cohabiting
1.28(0.99-1.65)
.057
1.39(1.07-1.81)
.014
Widowed
1.26(1.04-1.53)
.018
1.11(0.91-1.36)
.307
Divorced/Separated
1.30(0.95-1.77)
.100
1.23(0.89-1.70)
.207
Religion
Christianity
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Islam
0.51(0.35-0.76)
.001
0.45(0.30-0.67)
.000
Traditional
0.83(0.56-1.23)
.347
0.39(0.26-0.58)
.000
Others
0.63(0.34-1.18)
.150
0.26(0.14-0.48)
.000
Parity
Low
Ref
Ref
Ref
Multi
0.79(0.74-0.84)
.000
1.05(0.96-1.16)
.278
Grand
0.75(0.70-0.80)
.000
0.96(0.88-1.04)
.286
Variable
Health Seeking Behaviour of Women of Reproductive Ages Diagnosed with Malaria in Pregnancy
Socio-demography
OR (95% CI)
AOR (95% CI)
Region of Residence
Urban
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Rural
0.54(0.46-0.63)
.000
0.80(0.67-0.97)
.019
Highest Educational Level
None
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Primary
3.87(2.76-5.45)
.000
2.17(1.44-3.27)
.000
Secondary
2.21(1.52-3.21)
.000
1.52(1.01-2.30)
.045
Higher
1.73(1.22-2.46)
.002
1.34(0.92-1.94)
.125
Wealth Index
Poorest
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Poorer
4.36(3.36-5.66)
.000
2.22(1.59-3.09)
.000
Middle
2.33(1.77-3.07)
.000
1.31(0.94-1.82)
.114
Richer
1.76(1.33-2.32)
.000
1.18(0.86-1.61)
.312
Richest
1.71(1.29-2.27)
.000
1.36(1.01-1.83)
.041
Age Group
<18 years
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
19-29 years
1.28(0.86-1.90)
.233
1.03(0.65-1.64)
.889
30-39 years
0.98(0.78-1.22)
.822
1.00(0.76-1.31)
.971
40-49 years
0.74(0.58-0.93)
.011
0.82(0.64-1.04)
.106
Marital Status
Never in union
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Married/cohabiting
1.07(0.64-1.78)
.794
1.31(0.77-2.20)
.318
Widowed
0.64(0.44-0.94)
.021
0.57(0.39-0.84)
.004
Divorced/Separated
0.50(0.22-1.11)
.090
0.51(0.23-1.15)
.102
Religion
Christianity
Ref
Ref
Ref
Ref
Islam
2.62(0.36-19.03)
.340
2.72(0.37-19.91)
.324
Traditional
4.33(0.60-31.35)
.147
2.98(0.41-21.90)
.283
Others
8.05(0.93-69.46)
.058
4.96(0.56-43.57)
.149
Parity
Low
Ref
Ref
Ref
Multi
0.86(0.72-1.01)
.066
0.95(0.75-1.20)
.660
Grand
0.88(0.74-1.05)
.150
1.05(0.85-1.28)
.676
Discussion
This study was conducted to assess how socio-demographic factors affect the occurrences and health seeking for malaria in pregnancy among Nigeria women of reproductive ages. The socio-demographic factors assessed in this study includes region of residence, highest educational level, wealth index, age group, marital status, religion and parity. After controlling for other variables, some socio-demographic variables were found to be significantly associated with intake of IPT and health seeking for malaria in pregnancy. It is also important to note that recommendation has been made by the World Health Organization that countries should adopt intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) for malaria in pregnancy Despite numerous programs and policies developed and implemented to prevent disease and improve access to healthcare services in African countries, socio-economic status significantly impacts the occurrence and health seeking behaviours for infectious disease Education plays a critical role on health awareness and literacy especially in populations where there are limitations in the health systems and health care service delivery Although there are limited studies assessing relationship between socio-demographic variables and intake of preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy, finding from this study is consistent with a previous study that revealed the influence of educational level in increasing the likelihood to utilize preventive method for malaria in pregnancy In this study, there was a significant increase in the likelihood of women to take IPT during pregnancy among married/cohabiting women compared to single women. On the other hand, there was a significantly increased likelihood of widowed women to seek formal healthcare for malaria in pregnancy compared to single women. It is expected that married women due to their experiences in pregnancies and increased knowledge of malaria in prevention, should seek formal healthcare for malaria in pregnancy However, another Nigerian study found the divorced/separated were less likely than single women to seek formal healthcare for malaria in pregnancy This study is however not without limitations. Due to the use of NDHS, there were many missing variables which may have affected the statistical strength of our findings. Also, due to incomplete data, it was impossible to assess the influence of other socio-demography on other key healthcare indices relevant to this study. Also, the use of survey data increases the risk of measurement errors, and information bias as some of the variables assessed were dependent on the participant s ability to recall previous experiences. However, this research has provided evidence of the existing limitations in strategies adopted in the prevention of malaria in pregnant women in Nigeria. It also provides adequate data to compare findings from previous studies and track progress in the awareness of IPT and utilization for appropriate healthcare for maternal illnesses. By using NDHS data, this study provides a more representative finding that can be generalized on the Nigerian population. With findings from this study, strategies can be adopted to improve prevention of malaria in pregnancy while improving health seeking behaviour of women of reproductive ages in Nigeria. Also, using NDHS data, the potential of selection bias has been reduced.
Conclusion
This study has revealed that socio-demographic factors predispose women of reproductive ages to the risk of malaria in pregnancy. Also, health seeking for malaria in pregnancy has been shown to be affected by socio-demographic factors. It is therefore important that strategies are adopted to reduce missing survey data. In order to improve the volume of missing data, the NDHS should adopt a semi-structure survey questionnaire that allows surveyors to provide adequate direction towards completion of the questionnaires without influencing participant’s decisions and choices. Also, knowledge about the prevention of malaria in pregnancy should be improved through awareness and campaigns programs that are targeted at high risk populations for malaria occurrence in pregnancy as indicated in this study. Although this study does not address other limitations to health seeking behaviour among women of reproductive ages, it is recommended that strategies be adopted to eliminate the barriers to access to healthcare service delivery among this population such as cost, distance and quality of healthcare service delivery. While the choices of women to seek healthcare can also influence household health seeking, more resource and public health actions must be targeted at this population in order to achieve universal healthcare coverage especially for high risk populations. This can be achieved to collaborations with both private and public stakeholders and program implementers involved in malaria prevention and care in Nigeria.